Content: Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Background: Slate Blackcurrant Watermelon Strawberry Orange Banana Apple Emerald Chocolate Marble
Pattern: Blank Waves Notes Sharp Wood Rockface Leather Honey Vertical Triangles
Welcome to TerraFirmaCraft Forums

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

  • Announcements

    • Crysyn

      Only help if you can be helpful

      Hey All, A topic has come up of late in the IRC channel in regards to the general feel of the forums and the community that supports them. Things have progressed further than I would have liked with out this being addressed more publicly because I would much rather have snubbed this out sooner rather than later.. but I have been busy. Here is the general rule I would like people to follow: Wheaton's Law "Don't be a dick." Those of you from the IRC channel know that this is the only rule I ask people in there to follow and we generally have a good and lively time chatting about all manner of things. This is basic rule that just about everyone understands and I am going to expand it to the forums from here moving forward. If you can not help people in a helpful and polite manner then I simply ask you to stop. Now I generally take a back seat to moderating the forums as I like to participate in the suggestions forum fairly heavily at times and would rather do so as a forums user than a moderator. But I am also fairly well known for being the person who constantly puts their foot down and so I am stepping up and doing so on here. If you find yourself unable to respond to a message politely then I ask that you do not respond. This mostly focuses on the increasing level of hostility found within the Suggestion forum as well as the Server forum. I do not care if this is the 30th some odd time you have seen someone make the same suggestion. Or even if the new post on an older topic is one entry above the old one. I expect the members of this forum to respond politely to the user, new or old, and point to the older topic if it applies and even go the extra step to suggest they either add in new information or to summarize the outcome of the previous discussion based upon the new post's entry into it. That is what we are here for, that is why I close most topics instead of deleting them, so that they can be found and referenced down the road. The next topic is the slew of derailment attempts I have seen as of late. If you want to have fun and joke around that is what the off topic forum is for and pretty much anything goes there. I do not expect to read a suggestion thread and have to go through 3 pages of image memes people have shot back and forth. Quite simply this is a waste of my time to read and then have to clean up. Now for the summary. I am going to start taking a more active role, especially in policing the suggestion forum, and handing out warn levels to people whom I see doing this. These will be indiscriminate and applied not to just the first person who derails or is impolite on a topic or response, but to everyone whom follows the lead of that person. As I do not like doing things with out giving you all warning this post shall serve as that warning. If you have a desire to bring this topic up with me then I invite you to do so on the IRC channel. Lets raise the level of quality and grow the community. Let us not descend into the quality often found on the minecraft or league of legend forums. There is simply no need for that here. Be passionate about things, just do not be abusive.
    • Kittychanley

      Offline Servers

      Recently I've seen a few server listings showing up on the first page of the Servers forum that have been closed for an extended period of time, but have recently gotten a reply from a new member who didn't realize the server is offline. To help prevent this from happening in the future, it would be greatly appreciated if you could use the report function on the original post of any servers that have been confirmed as offline, so that the topic may be locked. If you are the admin of a server and plan on taking the server offline, please use the report function on the original post of your topic to let the TFC Staff know that the topic should be locked. If you are the admin of a server that has a locked topic, and would wish to bring the server back online, please use the report function on the original post of the topic to let the TFC Staff know that the topic should be unlocked. As always, please remember to follow rule #3 of the servers forum and update your topic title to contain the version of TFC that the server is currently running. You can do so by editing the OP, and then clicking on "Use Full Editor."

Darmo

Contributor
  • Content count

    640
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Darmo

  1. Magic!

    Ya, Bioxx quite often made it clear that some of the ideas are still malleable. Things could always change. But we haven't heard anything to that effect really, as far as I know. If you want to discuss the nature of the game objective, you may want to post in one of those other threads - we've kind of started to derail from the magic thread here.
  2. Magic!

    here's a post I made in April, which is a sort of compendium of links to even older posts where Bioxx has touched on some of the broad-brush plans. I haven't gone and re-read every one of those links, but I think they'll cover most of the stuff that gave me the impression of TFC2 being very combat-oriented.
  3. Rat Model and Texture *FINAL*

    Lookin good!
  4. What binds players together

    I have limited experience in the SMP area - only TFC, and only 2 servers. Ghost towns happen, and that's probably mostly a result of player's lives or choice of games changing. Some degree of that is unavoidable. My impression is that two things hinder towning in current TFC: - Lack of a trade economy due to food and most materials be almost never needed and not particularly hard to get. - Lack of identity in a town. In terms of economy, what I most often see being used as currency is charcoal, iron, sequoia saplings, and occasionally wood types that aren't easy to find purely due to where town spawns are. Most stuff is barely needed, so it's not necessary to find much. The result of the lack of economy is the second problem, lack of identity for town members. Usually you have one person who is the master smith and is responsible for all the smithing due to the bonuses they impart. Sometimes there's a miner, sometimes a farmer. Miners are hit or miss because they don't *really* like it so it's too grindy for them and they quit, or on the other hand they're very competitive and love stacking up ingots in the town vault for bragging rights vs other town - this type will hang around as long as other town members are active. Farmers generally don't stay too long. Usually gone after they have 50+ barrels of pickled stuff that just rots because food is not hard to get, or after they've exhausted the alcohol lols. The mayor of the town is of course the most motivated usually, and is usually the head builder. So basically you have two major roles in a town: mayor, and smith. Everyone else is effectively second-class. The problem I see is that because smithing is the only truly skilled trade, smiths feel a strong sense of community identity, because everyone depends on them for good gear. Nobody else is really needed that badly. It's nice to have someone making sandwiches, but not hard to do that one's self. There's basically no need for leather or wool, so a dedicated animal person also isn't needed. Jute is precious early game, useless once you have animals. So I think people drift off because they don't have a clear role in the town. I think the number one thing TFC2 could do to foster towning is to arrange the game in such a way that distinct roles are either enforced, or highly desirable because of the time required. Difficulty of survival might help, but this is kind of a double edge sword. I've played on a 'hardcore' server that differed only from the regular in that there was no teleporting, and your town was not protected from mob spawns. That server was basically a ghost server. I suspect travel had the most to do with it. I enjoyed the increased difficulty, but at the same time I play SMP to actually see people. And I think most people don't like grindy travel. There would be a risk, I think, that if survival were too hard, it might decrease the player base a lot as they migrate to easier servers. Granted, people who like easy are usually more casual and don't stay long anyway. But again, SMP is to see people, not sit and mutter to the tumbleweeds about how hardcore I am. In any case, I think it'd be fairly easy to scale some aspects of survivability: Increase mob hps or speed, food rots faster, crops die, ores have less per nugget, etc. That stuff I think is fairly easy to tweak for server admins. The issues of fostering an economy and distinct game roles in a town context, those would need to be more 'baked in' I think.
  5. Magic!

    I've actually made that argument myself in other places, but the totality of the info that we have up to this points indicates that TFC2 is going to be heavily combat oriented. So I've been trying to suggest within that context, rather than roll the boulder uphill. Which isn't to say there's no room for non-combat stuff, there definitely is. But it seems that combat is going to be inescapable in single player, unless the player wants to spend the game in the stone age. SMP could have people specializing in non-combat roles, avoiding combat entirley, as long as they have combat oriented allies to advance up the tech tree with. At least that how it seems to me so far.
  6. Clothing

    True, that'd be a more logical hook (and one we're more likely to have). Though if you're also going to have sweating lower body temperature, you'd have to make sure you don't get in a feedback loop where the player gets warm enough to sweat, then sweating cools them below the sweating temp, but then they get warm enough to sweat, etc. Which is why in my page 2 detailed example I was basing sweating off the ambient temperature, rather than body temperature. I'm sure it could be dealt with another way though.
  7. Lynx

    I don't recall Bioxx expressing a desire one way or another on the African lynx. I believe I'd suggested a separate model would be good due to their appearing to have longer (less fluffy) bodies and legs (it could also work for an ocelot). But if you just wanted to do a skin for this model it'd probably suffice. Changes look good to me.
  8. Magic!

    That was my concern as well. How do you balance a non-magic path against anything outside combat magic? It does have potential to get extremely complex if true balance is desired. Personally I'd rather see magic encompass all manner of spells and enchantments, and not be limited to just combat stuff. I feel like the role of magic would be diminished if it's basically just an equivalent to a mundane path. I guess I prefer the classic D&D paradigm of the warrior being the tank, while the mage is the glass cannon. In video games, I'm used to your warrior type being the easiest to play - most reliable with fewest details to manage - while magic users are more complex and fragile, but ultimately more interesting. I don't think it's a bad thing. And in SMP, I think it'd be good for them to each have weaknesses that the other can reinforce, to encourage cooperation. Perhaps have ultimate crafting recipes that can only be completed with the help of each other.
  9. Clothing

    There is a large difference between metal touching (much less piercing) the skin, and metal outside a layer of padding. Here's a discussion by actual modern-day wearers of armor. And another from the same forum, though seems to have more historical opinion, less first-hand experience than the previous. They make good points about plate armor cutting the wind as opposed to mail which lets the wind right through. Also the matter of sweat soaking the underlayers during exertion, and then being a liability when not active in the cold. I rather doubt the devs intend to simulate sweating during exertion (though if fatigue came into the game, it'd be an easy hook for sweating). Also importance of wearing a cloak or other layers outside the armor. I'd imagine that historically you put on your armor the day of combat, maybe right before, did the heavy exertion of combat, and then if you were the winner you immediately dressed down and got by a fire to dry out. As opposed to video games where players don't really want to have to deal with such fine points in most cases, I'd guess. A single post elsewhere also pointed out that for the most part campaigns and combat in the field during winter were avoided for logistical reasons in the days of armor (though they were sometimes caught out). Sieges would have gone through winters, but involved shelter for both sides. So historically war during really freezing conditions was avoided. In the end it's a fine point. I do think that fur armor/clothing should provide more warmth than metal armor. And so in extreme conditions the player will indeed be better off in fur. I simply think it's a matter of the plate adding less warmth than the fur. Not amplifying the cold. But the sweating point does provide an argument for it. I'll have to take your word on the code stuff. I still think it'd be better to have clothes separate, so they can be an item that wears out and needs replacing, in order to give the player incentive to farm leather, wool, and other materials involved. The current version of TFC has a very unbalanced internal economy, in which leather and wool play almost no part. I think it would benefit the game greatly for the player to have actual ongoing need of these materials, and clothes that wear out is a way to do it. I don't think that four or five extra wearable slots is going to overly tax players. I don't really see why it would be taxing from a code perspective either - I'm not qualified to judge that, but Bioxx already added a back slot. How much harder could four other slots be? Tons of mods do it. You probably wouldn't actually need head slot for clothing, unless people were going to craft and wear hoods. The head armor slot could suffice for anything worn on the head.
  10. I think most all the major stuff is covered really. But a few other typical Euro-American candidates: peas, spinach, broccoli, eggplant, zucchini, radishes, beets, okra, cucumbers, asparagus, artichoke, brussel sprouts. Prickly pear cactus and pineapple for the more exotic side. I don't know if it's within the scope of your mod, but I always thought it odd that wild tomatoes and beans grow with a stake in the ground by them! I think it'd be interesting if there were both wild and staked versions of some crops. The wild ones would just be on the ground, but the player could make trellises of sticks for vines like tomatoes, peas, beans and cucumbers. This would increase the yield. Something like a 3x3 grid of sticks makes a trellis (something to do with all those sticks!) Player places trellis in a garden spot, then plants seed on the same spot. It would be neat if the wild recumbant versions would generate an additional 'child' block adjacent to the original 'parent' block. This would also make trellises more space efficient. I don't know how feasible that is. Another related thought is for gourds and melons to have a central parent plant, and surround themselves with vines. IRL these plants take up huge amounts of garden real estate. Basically the idea might be to plant the plant, and at it matures, it checks for clear spaces around itself, and if it finds one, produces vines on that spot. It could be a defined pattern (eventually fills a 5x5 grid centered on the 'parent' plant) or could be somewhat random (produces up to 25 vine blocks as far as 3 blocks from the parent plant, Each time searching for an existing vine or parent plant adjacent, before placing the new one). Then at the appropriate stage, a random number of the vine blocks flowers and fruits. Not all do. Might be pretty darn complicated. But would be more representative of how plants like watermelon and pumpkin actually grow, and the fact that they take up TONS of garden space. Just some thoughts! I've not the time right now, but down the road I could probably help with graphics if that would be helpful.
  11. Clothing

    I would not necessarily assume temperature will be the same. In TFC1 it scales in a linear fashion from equator. But TFC2 is confirmed to have climatic regions for each island (tropical, sub-tropical, temperate, sub-arctic, arctic). I am guessing that a given island will have a uniform temperature (at sea level). Bioxx also said once he even intends for different islands to experience their own weather, so the whole world won't necessarily be raining at once. One of the benefits of this system of uniform island climate is having no more acacia forest lines at a certain Y coord. Regarding fur-lined armor, that may make for a simpler interface, but more customize-able means more item ids (assuming it can't be done with metadata) and graphics (unless the look does not change) . Every modification will double the number of item ids required, and that's assuming you can only make 1 modification to a piece of armor. From the player standpoint, the player will have more control if the items are separate. That steel armor took a lot of time to make. Rather than force the player to make a second fur-lined suit of armor for the winter, why not simply allow them to put on warm clothes as well, and use the same set of armor? It might also be an option to allow the fur to be removed, though it would either need to have no durability, or code would have to track the durability for both fur and armor, on the fur-armor item, so that when they're separated the fur gets it's own durability. The math I might have to comment on later. But in short, I'm not sure I'd agree with armor multiplying cold. I'd probably argue that worn items should only add heat.
  12. Magic!

    Any thoughts on other aspects aside form weapon/armor enchants? Summoning, temporary buffs, other utility magic that isn't weapon/armor based? Would it be practical to pursue metal weapons, but magical summoning or buff spells? A player could kind of mix-and-match magic and mundane things? And would there be mundane parallels to the other magics, such as alchemy (parallels magic buffs) and engineering (parallels summoning via constructed automatons)? And presumably a player could pursue these things in whatever mix they wish?
  13. Magic!

    Well, I don't know if you were interested in any comments from me given that I've already commented quite a bit on your other threads. But knowing that you advocate for allowing simultaneous pursuit of all skills, I'm interested in how you envision the division between Sam and Conan actually working. You talk of Conan using natural armors and weapons. But what's to stop him from using metal ones? Are only natural weapons and armor enchantable? I'm curious if you're envisioning more than just roleplay separating Sam and Conan?
  14. Encumberance

    I am not aware of any cart mechanics being revealed. Only that they will exist. Hopefully the player won't be able to climb a ladder with one, at the very least. I think it would be interesting if the player was not allowed to jump while pulling one. Then travel is dealt with in one of two ways: the player gains the ability to simply walk up 1-block rises while wearing the cart, or, they could have to 'pave' themselves a path with half-slabs and/or stairs. This would kind of simulate cart paths, rather than just having them be totally offroad vehicles. It would also make players naturally stick to low-slope terrain with the carts, which is believable. This would give mules a parallel purpose, in being able to off-road it. If this were the method it'd be good if half-slabs could be made of dirt, sand, and gravel in order to make as natural a path as possible, But even if cobble half-slabs was as 'natural' as it got, that would probably work. At least their stone type could match the terrain. And the hand cart could be an early-game mine cart, as long as the player builds a sloping passage with stairs. It would of course hold far less than an actual minecart.
  15. Encumberance

    Slight addition; as Bioxx mentioned in the OP, he is also adding hand carts. So that's another transportation method. It's been awhile since I read this thread, but I don't remember mounts ignoring weight being brought up as an issue. I'd assume Bioxx can code it so that mounts have a weight limit where appropriate (maybe mine carts are unlimited). Junk piles would be quite humorous, but I don't really think they're probably necessary. Players will have some early game storage options. If carried containers reducing weight became a thing, it might be good to add a durability to the container, reduced every time the player removes and/or adds something. If containers wear out, then the player will have to remake them, and maybe it becomes worthwhile to add the resources necessary, which could be as simple as leather (stone-age-makeable) or reeds for basket weaving. As opposed to if they never wear out, in which case the player makes one and it lasts forever, and if they can do that in the stone-age, you practically may as well just not have it, it becomes almost as superfluous as javelins.
  16. World Generation Suggestion

    As Stroam mentioned, the north-south coordinate is the Z coordinate. In defiance of the precedent of basically the entire rest of the engineering and scientific world. And yes, if your Z is at 0, you are right in the north-south middle of the equator, always. X coordinate is how far east or west along the equator you are. And Y is your elevation above bedrock.
  17. Have you read, understood, and followed all of the rules listed in large text at the top of the suggestions forum?(Yes/No): YES So, this thought largely came about as I was thinking about how one might limit the number of skills a player can reasonably pursue, per the Exclusivity of Trades Post I made awhile back. It involves a couple possible different ways to limit the number of trades a player could pursue with a given character. I searched the old TFC suggestion forums and found no discussion of this in the first few pages, but even if it had been, TFC2 right? STAT POINTS The player could have stats. Could be full-on D&D-style Strength, Intelligence, Wisdom, Dexterity, Constitution, and Charisma. Could be different. But the idea would be that different trades require different stats to be good at, or maybe even have flat-out stat-gates. GAINING POINTS The player might start with 1 in all stats, and then they get a stat point for every X levels they attain. I'll use 5 as an example. So when the player *first* reaches level 5, they get a stat point, which they apply to the stat of their choice in the appropriate tab of the inventory/skill/etc screen. THIS ONLY HAPPENS ONCE. If they die and attain level 5 again, they do not get another point (but they do keep points already earned, maybe). They get their second stat point at level 10, and so forth. This makes experience levels very important, as opposed to how they are now, just a kind of nice hp bonus. I'm not sure what the hard/practical level limit is. Some googling turned up a lot of answers, but it seemed like many felt the practical limit is about 50. Players may not like being limited by level advancement though. STAT GATES Stats *could* come into play via 'hard' gates. So a smith for instance, can work copper (tier 1) with 1 or 2 strength, depending on the desired balance. Tier 2 metals require another point of strength. Tier 3 another, etc. If the player does not have sufficient strength, they just can't work the metal period. This can probably be applied to other trades as well, such as magic, but perhaps using intelligence in that case, for example. STAT SLOPES Stats could also be a 'soft' limiting factor, if the systems inherent in each trade become more difficult with lower stats. So in the case of smithing, perhaps the unseen target numbers for each tier of metal get higher and higher. A copper pick might have a target (in a specific seed) of 50. A bronze pick 250. Iron 500, steel 1000. But the amount that the smithing buttons moves the pointer also changes depending on the player's strength. A weak player will have to spend more and more hits to work higher tier metals, as their strength lags behind 'the slope'. While a player that keeps their strength in line with the tier slope, has to expend much fewer hits. So weak players will spend more hammers, and more time just getting up the vicinity of the target, leaving less time to find the sweet spot before cooling. If a system such as exhaustion came into play, the weak player would also become exhausted sooner, as each hit would reduce that meter (Increasing constitution would increase the player's exhaustion meter, obviously). In this way, a player *could* still smith metals without pumping STR, but they will pay a price in efficiency. Other major trades - magic for instance - can have similar things. But minor crafts could also be affected. For instance if gemology became a fairly complicated craft, it could play off of dexterity. There could be an entirely separate branch of smithing for jewelry (mainly for enchantment) that relies on dexterity rather than strength. If there were perhaps different branches of magic, some might play off wisdom instead. The agriculture skill could involve wisdom (bonus seeds only with high skill+wisdom). Looms could use dexterity (introduce a chance to fail and lose half the thread). Butchering could have reduced yield for low dexterity. Scraping the hide has a chance to reduce leather yield by 1, or ruin it entirely, with low dexterity. Arrows could have some random error introduced, reduced by higher dexterity. There's a lot of minor ways to influence these non-trade tasks. Whether stat 'gates', or 'slopes', or a combination, I think this system would allow the player to customize their character to a degree. Maybe they spread out their points so they can do some low-tier smithing, and also low-tier magic. Or they go all-out on constitution and strength and become a smithing machine. The hard part is making sure all stats have a good amount uses (charisma may not make the cut) TRADE FRICTION Trade Friction is the concept that some trades could conflict with others directly, discouraging or preventing the player from pursuing multiple trades. I suggested this in my nature magic post, in the magic thread. In that case, pursuing blacksmithing a lot 'contaminates' the player with pollution, bumping up a hidden meter that, if it goes to high, starts to interfere with or prevent certain nature magics. If nature magic and arcane magic both existed, arcane magic could also have a similar taint, to discourage a player doing both kinds of magic. So a player smith would have a harder and harder time, the further they try to go in nature magic. The problem with this is it might be hard to rationalize a reason in some cases, and the more trades there are, the harder it becomes. So why would magic interfere with the smithing trade? It could be that the magic of TFC2 is heavily earth/magnetism based, and that all this messing with geomantic forces gives them a personal quasi-magnetic field. This field alters smithing, such that rather than the target number being consistent for the mage for any given product, it has a chance to be different sometimes. And if the mage delves too far, eventually the smithing target is different every single time, for the same product. Maybe some move buttons will even start to randomize. Eventually it would become prohibitively difficult for the mage to do smithing. But if alchemy became a full-on profession separate from magic, what then? It could probably be argued to still pollute vs nature magic. Maybe even have contaminating effects on arcane magic. But why would it impede smithing? So that's kind of an issue with the trade friction concept. There could also be trade completion order issues, which must be watched for. The friction would need to be constant, in everyday use of the trade. Otherwise, if there were for instance just gates where a druid can't progress if they're polluted too much, but otherwise pollution has no other effects, the player could complete the druid ladder first and then start smithing, with no issues, having passed all the druid 'friction gates'. By incorporating pollution checks into every spell use and item creation, the player cannot continue to be a great druid if they then contaminate themselves. Yet, if nature magic did not have a static effect vs arcane magic, the player could complete the nature magic tree, and then do all the arcane tree. Losing their powerful nature magics, but doing all the arcane, effectively completing two full trees in one playthrough. This may or may not be a concern, but an LPer could complete both tracks in one LP. So those were my thoughts on this so far. I don't know if any of this is of interest to the devs, but to do it right, it would probably need to be planned from the start across many areas, so I wanted to get the thought out there.
  18. World Generation Suggestion

    In a nutshell, it already does. TFC doesn't have biomes in the same way vanilla does. The topography - plains, hills, mountains - generates independent of anything else. Which makes perfect sense. Then, temperature varies based on distance north-south. And beyond that, there is moisture - my understanding is that this is independent of z coords. So what happens is the topography is the baseline, then the game checks the temperature and moisture, and generates animals and trees based on these three factors. So the current TFC already changes plants an animals depending on z coords. Animals also respond to topography, while trees respond to rainfall. Both factors independent of z coords (to the best of my knowledge). Now in TFC2, my understanding is that each island will have it's own uniform climate. There will be tropical in the center, then sub-tropical, temperate, sub-arctic, and arctic, these will be both north and south of the tropical equator. So rather than having specific temperature ranges, the plants and animals will (presumably) have certain climates that they appear in. One of the benefits of climates as opposed to north-south temperature gradients, is that you won't have that abrupt line of acacia that TFC1 has at a certain z coordinates
  19. Stat Points & Trade Friction

    The problem is those are universal values that don't account for different players. And while it's a simulation of rl skill loss, it might be a poor game mechanic for player enjoyment. When people work hard for something, especially something like building up a skill, I think they won't react favorably to losing it. I've seen the strongest reactions to loss of skills, rather than loss of gear. Personally I can go on a rl building spree for days. I'd not appreciate losing hard-won skills just because I was trying to improve the atmosphere of the server, and I think it would tend to disincentivize such projects, unless the time cushion was extremely long. That said, it does sound like it'd be easy-ish to add, and easy to get rid of with a couple configs. It's definitely a viable option. Plus - and this is I think the biggest bonus of this method - it allows a player to re-align if they find that one chosen 'career' path isn't actually all that much to their liking. It's more adaptable.
  20. Any Information

    Also the growing menagerie of critters. Witness Therighthon's llama - light years ahead of Mojang's, and shearable to boot! And Konlii's fantastic camel, a much more sensible mount than a llama, which irl cannot generally carry a grown human, much less one with gear. Just two animals out of many.
  21. Stat Points & Trade Friction

    I like the idea of skill degradation. I could see where that might be a soft system of specialization. Sounds really hard to balance to me, but that's just me. The give-and-take idea sounds a bit convoluted to me. I'm not sure how that's better than a stat point system where you can choose to put all your points in one or two stats and super-specialize, or spread them across the board the be mediocre at many things. I guess you get to be great for awhile and then mediocre, but that doesn't seem like a great progression arc imo. As for the 'non-combat' roles, that stuff could either be somewhat related to the primary profession via commonality of stat points, or it could be entirely unrelated if progression were via skill web. in a SMP environment, if someone wanted to focus on farming then that would be entirely doable. They could have other people doing the risky combat stuff, and they focus on their farming. SMP would be ideal for that. In single player, you'd need to have at least some aggressive skills in order to progress down the island chain. But that's SP. It's known that you're on your own in that case. The progression can be designed such that a player can progress in their primary profession, and also several trades. They could even be entirely separated, so that professions use an entirely different set of points from trades. So in a skill web scenario the player might gain a profession point every level, and also a trade point. Profession points can only be used in the primary combative tracks - fighter, mage, etc. Trade points are used for non-combative things. Farming, animal husbandry, gemology, glassmaking, etc. So then every player has a combat profession provided for, but also some 'hobbies', as it were. They could be a focused fighter that dabbles in many hobbies, a fighter/mage/alchemist that is the best gemologist in the world, or anything in between. I don't see builder as a coded skill. The game is basically about building and I don't think it's a good idea to prevent anyone from building. I think it would be better if one person cannot make the very best weapons and enchant them with the very best magic. I don't mind someone making mediocre weapons and enchanting the with mediocre magic. But if the only way to get top notch weapons with top notch enchantments is via SMP, I'm ok with that. It could get people out playing and trading in a community. Forming adventuring bands of varied skills. As long as the generalist can still progress in SP, I see no harm in their being limited. To me smithing is part and parcel of a 'warrior' profession, so a smith would never be penalized for combat. Smithing skills would be part of the profession progression. I think skill degradation could run into issues with the fact that different people have different playstyles. Some might go on long exploration trips, socialize a lot, spend a lot of time building (this would be the biggest problem I think), or just not generally be as 'on-point', and would suffer for it. While the players who grind the most would see the benefit. So it's got it's own problems imo. But I do like the aspect of being the softest of the soft specialization systems.
  22. Boats/Rafts

    With regards to preventing island-hopping, I think the last plan we'd heard is that a player won't be allowed to mine or place blocks on new islands. They first have to find a fortress and defeat the 'boss' of that fortress, which then releases a part of the island for the player to mine/build on. My impression is that each island will be controlled by a humanoid race of some kind, that uses weapons and armor. The player will be forced to craft weapons and armor of sufficient quality to beat these mobs and take over the island. So if this is how things pan out, there will be no 'easy' island-hopping, and no under-ocean tunneling at all. The build/mine prohibition thing isn't exactly the smoothest or most believable mechanic, but it does pretty neatly address the island-hopping issue.
  23. Stat Points & Trade Friction

    If the game is designed for it, I think stats can work. But the game would definitely have to be designed and balanced around the notion. I can't find the post it was discussed in now, but the idea was that Every class can do some basic things. This includes magic users being able to smith metals up to bronze (or higher in the 'soft slope' scenario). So the divergence doesn't take place immediately. A mage can still smith lower tier tools. They aren't dependent upon other players entirely for that. And they'll be able to tan hides, make alcohol, basically all the stuff in the current version of TFC except high tier metal working. Beyond that, the notion of whether or not someone else is "required" depends on what one thinks the goal of the game is. TFC2 ostensibly seems to have the goal of progressing east and west across the islands to access higher tier materials. In general, all this requires is defeating higher tier mobs. And so as long as a magic user can defeat those mobs, and obtain materials, they can progress. So yes, the mage class does need to be balanced such that they can accomplish this alone. If there is to be a goal beyond this, I've not picked up on it. But even within this context, I think there could be some islands inhabited by mobs that are resistant to either magic or weapons. Because the player has 9 different avenues to proceed in one direction. So if one island is too hard, move north or south and try again. The key is to make sure the player can progress. If gemology became a significant side-trade, it would simply need to be arranged that it provides bonuses, not blockades. So if higher quality gems were used to make magic wands with more durability/more charges, that's a bonus, but if a player is a mage and is not themselves, nor do they have access to a professional gemologist, they can still make wands and staves and such. They'll just have to make more of them. If a player is not a master level animal tamer, they may not be able to keep care of a huge menagerie of exotic animals in their home base (those tropical giraffes keep getting sick and dieing in the player's sub-arctic base) but they can still get the stuff they need with the animals native to the region, and maybe an occasional foray into the tropics. The player might not be able to be a master horticulturalist and cultivate the rarest herbs, but they can buy them from npcs in far-off lands. The key here is to differentiate between a full-on profession, and bonus trades. I would define a profession as something that has an aggressive mode of operation allowing progress through he islands. Weapons and magic are the two obvious ones, and should be relatively easy to balance. More exotic professions would be alchemist, and engineer. The alchemist would have a variety of potions and poisons, and maybe even crude guns. The engineer mechanical weapons, and eventually automatons. Perhaps an animal tamer can train super-strong animals to fight for them. the more exotic the trade the harder to balance (and tons more work for devs obviously). But each actual profession must have the ability to progress across the islands on their own, absolutely. But SMP is where differentiated professions would shine I think. Others will mumble in awe as you fly by one your magic carpet (mage only) pegasus/griffin/chimera/dragon (tamer only) or gyrocopter (engineer only). Smiths would be the tank, and basically the default, least complicated class. They might not be as flashy, but they would be in demand as all other classes would get bonuses from well smithed products. Now if the goal is assumed to be to master everything, then yes obviously that's directly opposed to the notion of trade/profession divisions. I might argue it's better to have the divisions baked into the game, because it'd be far easier to remove the barriers, for those who don't like them. If stat points are involved, this would be as simple as removing the stat gates form certain skills, or pumping up the stat point gain rate in a 'soft division' scenario. I think some separation would improve the SMP aspect. The problem I've experienced in SMP is there's no economy. Everyone can get/make everything. The only things people trade in a meaningful way are difficult to get things like sequoia saplings or graphite. And when I say trade I mean actually bartered trade. Not just giving away stuff, which happens a lot. I think it would be great if people could actually produce things that other players on the server simply cannot produce themselves, and hence have somewhat of an economy. I think this would also help keep people interested. Because right now you join a server, join a town, there's nothing you can do that everyone else can't. If people had an actual role and felt like the town depended on them for things, maybe they'd be more prone to stay around. It all depends on the dev's goals, in the end. They've expressed a desire in the past to focus on small-group multiplayer, and I think division of trades/professions would help this play style as well.
  24. Two paths(More tech or more magic)

    Ok, I get where you're coming from now. The druid/shaman mining wasn't you, that's me from another thread. The idea wasn't necessarily blacklisting, but I see you replied to the stat point/trade friction thread, so I'll address that there.
  25. Boats/Rafts

    So as you head east or west, the islands have progressively choppier water, requiring better and better ports? Because if the player has to build a port to leave every island, the tier 0 port is going to have to be pretty simple I think. The player won't have a lot of resources at that island. And if you don't have to upgrade each island, it probably won't be too hard for the player to just bring the materials for the new port with them, if it never has to improve beyond tier 0 tech. Well, aside from the weight mechanic. Moreover, depending on spawn parameters, if players are allowed to spawn on islands in a broad range of climates (which I think would be good) you'd have to make sure that at least early ports don't require resources that may be specific to one climate, such as wool, hemp, or reeds (though in actuality I would like to see these products each attainable in all climates). So a player in the arctic needs to be able to build a dock with things found in that climate. Your tier 0 raft port may need to be basically just sawn planks and some cobble riprap, both of which require metal tools, which would be attainable in any climate. Or even no port required at tier 0. Just hollow out a log canoe, or make one of hide stretched over bones. Overall it kind of seems like a complicated system to me, just to leave the island. I feel like it'd be enough to have a few tiers of ports for high level boats that have storage and animal transport options, faster transport time, etc. That way, if the player moves between islands via simpler methods, the ports can require possible rare materials like rope, cloth, and tar right from the start, because the player has a chance to hop some islands to find all these things. Players will still want these things, just because they like progression. I also think it'd probably be better to make the larger ships stationary, just to avoid the code headaches of large ship movement. Especially if this makes it easier for the player to customize their ship to a degree, for instance by putting barrels of fresh water and food where they want, and maybe carpeting their cabin, etc. So in that scenario, the player builds a port, constructs a large ship. They then can sail to adjacent regions. If the regions does not have a port, the ship is simply placed offshore anchored. Each of the four sides has an 'anchort spot', and the ship is placed on the one adjacent to the region from which the player arrived. Perhaps the player can move between the four offshore anchor points, and additionally any ports that are built can be added to the list for the region. The ship has a rowboat which the player can use to get to shore. In this way players could explore new regions without ports. But since they only have four fixed locations per (unported) island, they still would need to get in their rowboat to thoroughly explore. Ship repair could be accomplished by the player bringing cloth, rope, and tar with them. These could perhaps physically disappear as the ship accumulates wear from travel. So the player needs to check every so often and replace the missing pieces. If too much disappears, the ship wrecks, possibly becoming a permanent fixture on the bottom of the ocean! I hear ya on the minigame. That indeed might be a good idea, if fixed teleport times are the order of the day. Chasing down rats, fishing, maybe even crafting stations on larger ships. And ya, I'd agree that the port checks for the parts each time a boat is made/docked/repaired whatever. The lighthouse could perhaps have tiers, and higher tiers give a travel speed bonus. It'd be even better if the code could check the destination port for a lighthouse type, and so have two lighthouses factoring into travel. Though really a lighthouse is more of a benefit for arriving in a port than leaving. So maybe it only benefits travel time if the destination port has a lighthouse.