Configuration So Everyone Is Happy

[LordOfWolves 514]

The things that I suggested when I began the topic: How rare things are in their own world, limits that they have, what entities/blocks spawns/generates and what doesn't, how long it takes for plants and trees to grow, etc.

All this will be added later, when TFC will become not beta. How is this version called? Official?

[achartran 465]

All this will be added later, when TFC will become not beta. How is this version called? Official?

Yeah, Wolf is right, if these ever come it will be after beta. And beta could last for a while, like a really loooong while. (at least significantly into next year I would guess.)

[Menoch 335]

Yeah, Wolf is right, if these ever come it will be after beta. And beta could last for a while, like a really loooong while. (at least significantly into next you I would guess.)

Into the next YOU?! Shit! You mean i have to live another life before i get to play the finished version?

[achartran 465]

Into the next YOU?! Shit! You mean i have to live another life before i get to play the finished version?

Lol, whoops, missed that typo. XD

Meant to say "into next year"

it's fixed now.

[Just_Another_Guy_:) 1,066]

Into the next YOU?! Shit! You mean i have to live another life before i get to play the finished version?

No, it means you have to wait enough time so that it is statistically impossible for there not to be a second version of achartran :3

[LordOfWolves 514]

...a second version of achartran :3

Confusion time. I read ahcartran 3...oh mother of confusion!

[Just_Another_Guy_:) 1,066]

Confusion time. I read ahcartran 3...oh mother of confusion!

Even more confusion time!

Is zero even? :3

EDIT: NO SEARCHING IN GOOGLE GUYS ¬_¬

EDIT to the EDIT: OR ANYWHERE ELSE, FOR THAT MATTER ¬___¬

[achartran 465]

Even more confusion time!

Is zero even? :3

EDIT: NO SEARCHING IN GOOGLE GUYS ¬_¬

EDIT to the EDIT: OR ANYWHERE ELSE, FOR THAT MATTER ¬___¬

Since zero is zero (the lack of numbers), it doesn't exist. So it is neither even or odd, because it doesn't exist. At least I think this is right.

[Just_Another_Guy_:) 1,066]

It exist as an abstract number; even though it represents nothing, it's not nothing. It's an accepted number

From what i know, i think it is an even number... Let's put it this way: what's an even number? most people say: a number that can be divided by 2. 0 can be divided by 2:

0/2=0

While other people may say it has to be multiple of 2, and that's the case as well:

2*0=0

Or that it can be sumed to another even number, and the result is an even number. And that's also the case:

0+6=6

[achartran 465]

It exist as an abstract number; even though it represents nothing, it's not nothing. It's an accepted number

From what i know, i think it is an even number... Let's put it this way: what's an even number? most people say: a number that can be divided by 2. 0 can be divided by 2:

0/2=0

While other people may say it has to be multiple of 2, and that's the case as well:

2*0=0

Or that it can be sumed to another even number, and the result is an even number. And that's also the case:

0+6=6

Seems good to me, I suck at math to be honest. That was just a wild guess that came to mind

[transcengopher 349]

Zero and ones are numbers required to build a coordinates grid, where zero is the beginning of the grid and ones are the points that specify grid cell size.

[ExplosionGuy 14]

Zero and ones are numbers required to build a coordinates grid, where zero is the beginning of the grid and ones are the points that specify grid cell size.

Zero and ones are also the core building blocks of computer's. They represent on and off: zero being off, and one being on. It's like the cells of computers!

[Kimbblesrath 503]

Even more confusion time!

Is zero even? :3

EDIT: NO SEARCHING IN GOOGLE GUYS ¬_¬

EDIT to the EDIT: OR ANYWHERE ELSE, FOR THAT MATTER ¬___¬

I WOULD have answered this, but you already did...so...yeah.

[transcengopher 349]

Oh, I can easily add some more if you like.

There's the rule. There's three correct implementations of the rule:

22 => 11

26 => 13

28 => 14

But saying that, according this rule, 20 => 10 would be incorrect implementation.

My question is - what answer will the rule give when applied to 20? 10?

It's dangerous to go alone, take this two with you: _{or else I doubt you will stay sane}

1. This is Russian rule.

2. If you make this rule English, none of the above will remain correct, and there will be only one correct implementation that will look alike. - (This won't really help to find the rule, it's more of an observation and falsification rule.)

- Good luck, have fun. I won't post answer here, but you can PM me if you lost your sleep, and I will PM you the rule.

Note: I changed my post a bit, so it will supposedly give more correct impression on what is happening.